4,994
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 106:
Line 106: + +
→Jewkes Book(s)
==Jewkes Book(s)==
==Jewkes Book(s)==
The three books you list are the only actual usage of the term "New Ordeal" that I have found. The three books you list are also only one book. It was published in 1948 and reissued in 1968. It is also the book cited in the first citation you give, so you now have 4 cites all referring to a single 1948 book. You are trying hard to show that "New Ordeal" is a term in common parlance, at some point in time, but you are just chasing your tail. A term used in the title of a single book, and never referenced again by that term, hardly constitutes a term worthy of an encyclopedia entry. [[User:Boomcoach|Boomcoach]] 11:15, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
The three books you list are the only actual usage of the term "New Ordeal" that I have found. The three books you list are also only one book. It was published in 1948 and reissued in 1968. It is also the book cited in the first citation you give, so you now have 4 cites all referring to a single 1948 book. You are trying hard to show that "New Ordeal" is a term in common parlance, at some point in time, but you are just chasing your tail. A term used in the title of a single book, and never referenced again by that term, hardly constitutes a term worthy of an encyclopedia entry. [[User:Boomcoach|Boomcoach]] 11:15, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
:Yes, I'm not familiar with this book, but as nearly as I can tell by references to it, it's about ''post''-World-War-II planning in ''England.'' And as Boomcoach notes, "new" refers to a new ''edition'' of an earlier book. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:21, 12 June 2007 (EDT)