Changes

== Maybe R*bSm*th was right about these essays ==

== Maybe somebody was right about these essays ==

First off, "right-wing populism" is a misnomer—the actual policies are more Communist than they are conservative. Working-class populism, rampant activism for government-spearheaded natalism, anti–big business sentiment, populist nationalism? All hallmarks of the Soviet Union and probably every other Communist regime, and the same defining characteristics of modern-day "right-wing populists."

First off, "right-wing populism" is a misnomer—the actual policies are more Communist than they are conservative. Working-class populism, rampant activism for government-spearheaded natalism, anti–big business sentiment, populist nationalism? All hallmarks of the Soviet Union and probably every other Communist regime, and the same defining characteristics of modern-day "right-wing populists."

Secondly, the political reality functions under a thesis/antithesis deception game. The devil first brings the left to power to let its evils go on full display, and uses the resulting backlash to bring the "right" to power that will install the final Antichrist beast system. The beast will enforce false worship, which indicates a highly theocratic nature—[https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3540071-boebert-says-she-is-tired-of-separation-between-church-and-state-the-church-is-supposed-to-direct-the-government/ sound familiar?] Wake up! —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|^{Rev. 22:13}]]''''' Tuesday, 22:30, September 4, 2023 (EDT)

Secondly, the political reality functions under a thesis/antithesis deception game. The devil first brings the left to power to let its evils go on full display, and uses the resulting backlash to bring the "right" to power that will install the final Antichrist beast system. The beast will enforce false worship, which indicates a highly theocratic nature—[https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3540071-boebert-says-she-is-tired-of-separation-between-church-and-state-the-church-is-supposed-to-direct-the-government/ sound familiar?] Wake up! —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|^{Rev. 22:13}]]''''' Tuesday, 22:30, September 4, 2023 (EDT)

=== User: Conservative's rebuttal ===

=== rebuttal ===

A few points:  

A few points:  

The government should not allow big businesses' lobbyists to get regulators to set up nonsensical regulations to create artificial barriers for small businesses' entry into an industry. The government should make it harder for regulators to set up nonsensical regulations. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:22, September 5, 2023 (EDT)

The government should not allow big businesses' lobbyists to get regulators to set up nonsensical regulations to create artificial barriers for small businesses' entry into an industry. The government should make it harder for regulators to set up nonsensical regulations. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:22, September 5, 2023 (EDT)

====LT's response====

====response====

# Yes, social conservatism is objectively preferable to moral degeneracy, though one needs to understand how it goes both ways: in a moral society, social conservatism is a necessary bulwark to hold together basic standards, while an immoral society can utilize it to hold together and fuel a sinister system.

# Yes, social conservatism is objectively preferable to moral degeneracy, though one needs to understand how it goes both ways: in a moral society, social conservatism is a necessary bulwark to hold together basic standards, while an immoral society can utilize it to hold together and fuel a sinister system.

# More job-friendly? That in of itself has nothing wrong, though how it is portrayed and what agenda it serves matters. Both "right-wing populists" and old-school Communists are working-class populist agitators, left-wing nationalists (as opposed to right-wing "bourgeois" nationalism), and nativists who think that the "outsiders" don't belong.

# More job-friendly? That in of itself has nothing wrong, though how it is portrayed and what agenda it serves matters. Both "right-wing populists" and old-school Communists are working-class populist agitators, left-wing nationalists (as opposed to right-wing "bourgeois" nationalism), and nativists who think that the "outsiders" don't belong.