Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,346 bytes added ,  23:18, March 16, 2024
m
Reverted edits by RobSmith (talk) to last revision by Conservative
Line 23: Line 23:  
== Macron's wife is a possible transexual? Why is this in the article?  ==
 
== Macron's wife is a possible transexual? Why is this in the article?  ==
   −
{{warning collapse|reason=More trolling content|content=In the "biography section" at: https://www.conservapedia.com/Emmanuel_Macron#Biography , the [[Emmanuel Macron]] article goes into some nonsensical allegation that Macron's wife is a transexual.  
+
In the "biography section" at: https://www.conservapedia.com/Emmanuel_Macron#Biography , the [[Emmanuel Macron]] article goes into some nonsensical allegation that Macron's wife is a transexual.  
    
The fact is that Donald Trump, who used to own a beauty pageant, is married and well-known for his various relationships with women, famously commented on Macron's wife's figure (see: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2r9X8J1jnsc Trump praises Macron's wife's 'good shape'- BBC News]).
 
The fact is that Donald Trump, who used to own a beauty pageant, is married and well-known for his various relationships with women, famously commented on Macron's wife's figure (see: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2r9X8J1jnsc Trump praises Macron's wife's 'good shape'- BBC News]).
Line 34: Line 34:     
:And I even helped you on that article, having no idea what you were going to do with it. I was led to believe it was for educational purposes. But when it became clear your purpose and intent was mockery, I regret that collaboration with you. You deceived me. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 18:29, March 16, 2024 (EDT)}}
 
:And I even helped you on that article, having no idea what you were going to do with it. I was led to believe it was for educational purposes. But when it became clear your purpose and intent was mockery, I regret that collaboration with you. You deceived me. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 18:29, March 16, 2024 (EDT)}}
 +
::NASA probably has denied the man on the moon landing was a fraud allegation, but that doesn't mean we highlight it in the 2nd section of the [[Apollo 11]] Conservapedia article. Oh well, some people double down on their craziness because they loathe admitting that they are wrong about matters. 
 +
 +
::Unfortunately, I don't expect the Emmanuel Macron to hit the 1,000,000 a page view benchmark. It's not even close the 100,000 page view benchmark. The leading section is terrible because it doesn't follow the principle of an article building a case and having a reasonable tone and statements so people don't bail from the article early. For example, the Macron article engages in hyper-partisan language that is not even accurate in places (Macron is fascist, etc. France was taken over by fascist Germany in WWII and now they have a fascist president?). What this does is prevent the people who are persuadable from diving deeper into the article. So you are merely preaching to the choir which is a pretty lame and pointless exercise.  I would suggest dumping your frequent all-or-nothing thinking which makes it more likely that you engage in demonization. So many of your articles have hyper-partisan, poor lede paragraphs/sections which prevent persuadable readers from digging into the articles. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:49, March 16, 2024 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,865

edits

Navigation menu