Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,634
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 609:
Line 609: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
User talk:Aschlafly (view source)
Revision as of 17:39, September 28, 2025
, 17:39, September 28, 2025→Timeouts problem
In this rhetorically boxing match, by decision Grok rules me the winner! But no knockout punches. A win is a win though so I am once again Victorious with a capital V! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:32, September 28, 2025 (EDT)
In this rhetorically boxing match, by decision Grok rules me the winner! But no knockout punches. A win is a win though so I am once again Victorious with a capital V! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:32, September 28, 2025 (EDT)
Copilot: Conservapedia's policies that allow for a degree of trolling may inadvertently create an environment that can be exploited by extremist groups, potentially leading to harmful consequences like DDoS attacks.
Conservapedia
Tolerance of Trolling at Conservapedia
Conservapedia has stated that while it permits open discussion, it also has policies against trolls, but the line can be thin. Such tolerance may lead to various forms of trolling, including comments and actions associated with extremist views. The wiki's framework, which emphasizes freedom of speech over stringent moderation, can lead to an uptick in disruptive behaviors.
Conservapedia
Rise of Neo-Nazi Cyber Threats
There has been a noted increase in cyberattacks associated with neo-Nazi groups, which can include tactics like Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks. These extremists often use online platforms to coordinate actions and share ideology, and an environment of tolerance for trolling can attract such groups to exploit vulnerabilities.
Salon.com
Potential for Harm
The interplay between lax moderation and extremist rhetoric creates an environment where harmful individuals can feel emboldened to act. The risk is particularly significant considering that some neo-Nazi groups engage in physical and cyberattacks, including targeting infrastructure and promoting violent ideology. If platforms like Conservapedia fail to adequately moderate harmful content, this may facilitate further harmful actions, such as DDoS attacks.
Salon.com
Conclusion
While the fundamental principles of conservatism and freedom of speech are valid, there needs to be a responsible approach to how platforms handle controversial views and trolling. A failure to effectively manage such ideologies can create not only reputational risks for the platform itself but can also pose real-world ramifications, including potential cyber threats.
Overall, while Conservapedia’s system may aim for openness, heightened awareness and improved moderation practices are essential to prevent exploitation by malicious actors.
'''Comment: Any attempt at a [[policy]] discussion''' quickly turns into a [[spam]] session, which is a [[disruptive behavior]]. This problem also needs to be addressed. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:39, September 28, 2025 (EDT)
===Reinventing the wheel===
Expanded server capacity should be how Conservapedia fixes its problems. That means having Admin with judgement and reason, not just goons with sledgehammers who like to play ''Space Invaders'' and smash their enemies.
That means establishing [[Sysop accountability]] and [[dispute resolution]]. There's a lot that can be learned from the experience of larger platforms in dealing with trolls, vandals, problematic editors, disruptions, disputes, etc. Everytime it's suggested, reformers are shouted down and accused of being "[[liberal]]". [[Conservapedia]] ceased being a "[[meritocracy]]" a long time ago. It's [[anarchy]] with unaccountable sysops.
Conservapedia has tried to reinvent the wheel, and failed. But look up - there's a lot to be learned from Twitter's transition to [[X]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:54, September 28, 2025 (EDT)
:[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_8302afb3-fbaa-4583-9b27-6eb89ed6d8bc What is the probability that expanded server capacity fixes Conservapedia's timeout problem? Please take into account that Conservapedia uses MediaWiki version 1.24.2. Please also consider MediaWiki setting adjustments, Conservapedia does not use Cloudflare and and the likelihood that better and very economically DDOS mitigation solutions are available and that server capacity may not be the problem but server configuration may be the issue?]
:"Summary: Based on the above, the probability that solely expanding server capacity fixes Conservapedia's timeouts is 25%." [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:29, September 28, 2025 (EDT)
::It's a false assumption, [[spam]], and [[trolling]].
::It says nothing about the key elements implied in the proposal:
::*Exapnding the user base;
::*Expanding the number of Sysops;
::*Implementing [[dispute resolution]];
::*Implementing [[Sysop accountability]].
::Or a host of other reforms, such as such disciplining sysops with a history of abuse, discipling or revoking Sysop powers of admin who play ''Space Invaders'' with the banhammer, etc.
:: [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:11, September 28, 2025 (EDT)
===Reinventing the wheel===
===Reinventing the wheel===
Expanded server capacity should be how Conservapedia fixes its problems. That means having Admin with judgement and reason, not just goons with sledgehammers who like to play ''Space Invaders'' and smash their enemies.
Expanded server capacity should be how Conservapedia fixes its problems. That means having Admin with judgement and reason, not just goons with sledgehammers who like to play ''Space Invaders'' and smash their enemies.