Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,634
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 636:
Line 636: − − ===Reinventing the wheel=== − Expanded server capacity should be how Conservapedia fixes its problems. That means having Admin with judgement and reason, not just goons with sledgehammers who like to play ''Space Invaders'' and smash their enemies. − − That means establishing [[Sysop accountability]] and [[dispute resolution]]. There's a lot that can be learned from the experience of larger platforms in dealing with trolls, vandals, problematic editors, disruptions, disputes, etc. Everytime it's suggested, reformers are shouted down and accused of being "[[liberal]]". [[Conservapedia]] ceased being a "[[meritocracy]]" a long time ago. It's [[anarchy]] with unaccountable sysops. − − Conservapedia has tried to reinvent the wheel, and failed. But look up - there's a lot to be learned from Twitter's transition to [[X]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:54, September 28, 2025 (EDT) − :[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_8302afb3-fbaa-4583-9b27-6eb89ed6d8bc What is the probability that expanded server capacity fixes Conservapedia's timeout problem? Please take into account that Conservapedia uses MediaWiki version 1.24.2. Please also consider MediaWiki setting adjustments, Conservapedia does not use Cloudflare and and the likelihood that better and very economically DDOS mitigation solutions are available and that server capacity may not be the problem but server configuration may be the issue?] − − :"Summary: Based on the above, the probability that solely expanding server capacity fixes Conservapedia's timeouts is 25%." [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:29, September 28, 2025 (EDT) − − ::It's a false assumption, [[spam]], and [[trolling]]. − − ::It says nothing about the key elements implied in the proposal: − − ::*Exapnding the user base; − − ::*Expanding the number of Sysops; − − ::*Implementing [[dispute resolution]]; − − ::*Implementing [[Sysop accountability]]. − − ::Or a host of other reforms, such as such disciplining sysops with a history of abuse, discipling or revoking Sysop powers of admin who play ''Space Invaders'' with the banhammer, etc. − − :: [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:11, September 28, 2025 (EDT)
User talk:Aschlafly (view source)
Revision as of 17:39, September 28, 2025
, 17:39, September 28, 2025→Reinventing the wheel
'''Comment: Any attempt at a [[policy]] discussion''' quickly turns into a [[spam]] session, which is a [[disruptive behavior]]. This problem also needs to be addressed. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:39, September 28, 2025 (EDT)
'''Comment: Any attempt at a [[policy]] discussion''' quickly turns into a [[spam]] session, which is a [[disruptive behavior]]. This problem also needs to be addressed. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:39, September 28, 2025 (EDT)
===Reinventing the wheel===
===Reinventing the wheel===