Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, Moderators, protect
28,107
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,372:
Line 1,372: − + − + + + + + + + +
→Slight edit
[https://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page#80_years_ago:_.22The_oil.2C_with_which_the_Arab_countries_are_endowed.2C_covers_a_multitude_of_sins.22][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:21, May 13, 2026 (EDT)
[https://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page#80_years_ago:_.22The_oil.2C_with_which_the_Arab_countries_are_endowed.2C_covers_a_multitude_of_sins.22][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:21, May 13, 2026 (EDT)
== Slight edit ==
== Slight edit: NYT = anti zionist ==
NYT was, traditionally, not zionist. Thanks. [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:22, May 20, 2026 (EDT)
[[NYT]] was, traditionally, not zionist. It was anti Israel till post Six-Day war. Then again anti Israel since the Intifada..increasingly.
Thanks.
<i>
Traditionally, the editorial and ownership stance of The New York Times was deeply rooted in the ideological principles of "classical" and Reform Judaism, which historically viewed Judaism strictly as a religion rather than a nationality or race. Under early publisher Adolph Ochs and his successor Arthur Hays Sulzberger, the paper maintained a strong anti-Zionist perspective, arguing that a Jewish state could compromise the patriotism of American Jews.
This historical opposition and editorial tone are defined by several key elements:The Publisher’s Stance: Arthur Hays Sulzberger, publisher from 1935 to 1968, was an outspoken anti-Zionist. He argued that Zionism was counterproductive and, in some speeches, controversially blamed it for introducing a "political element" to the Jewish refugee crisis that made resolution more difficult during the Holocaust.
The American Council for Judaism: Sulzberger was closely aligned with and gave prominent coverage to the American Council for Judaism (ACJ), a group of classical Reform rabbis and prominent Jews founded in 1942 to actively oppose the creation of a Jewish state.Coverage of the Holocaust: In her book Buried by the Times, historian Laurel Leff documented how the publisher’s anti-Zionist convictions and fears of the paper being perceived as a "Jewish newspaper" led to downplaying Nazi atrocities and burying critical reports of the Holocaust in the back pages.</i>[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:30, May 20, 2026 (EDT)