Changes

[[NYT]] was, traditionally, not zionist. It was anti Israel till post Six-Day war. Then again anti Israel since the Intifada..increasingly.  

[[NYT]] was, traditionally, not zionist. It was anti Israel till post Six-Day war. Then again anti Israel since the Intifada..increasingly.  

Thanks.  

Thanks.  

<i>

<i>

Traditionally, the editorial and ownership stance of The New York Times was deeply rooted in the ideological principles of "classical" and Reform Judaism, which historically viewed Judaism strictly as a religion rather than a nationality or race. Under early publisher Adolph Ochs and his successor Arthur Hays Sulzberger, the paper maintained a strong anti-Zionist perspective, arguing that a Jewish state could compromise the patriotism of American Jews.

Traditionally, the editorial and ownership stance of The New York Times was deeply rooted in the ideological principles of "classical" and Reform Judaism, which historically viewed Judaism strictly as a religion rather than a nationality or race. Under early publisher Adolph Ochs and his successor Arthur Hays Sulzberger, the paper maintained a strong anti-Zionist perspective, arguing that a Jewish state could compromise the patriotism of American Jews.