nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: +
→Venting Frustrations....: Semi-protection
:Yes, I asked a question about locked articles, but I don't see how that could possibly go against me. And there really aren't "so very few of them," the first edit I wanted to make I couldn't even do. I can see why you may feel the need to protect some articles more than others, but why sysop-only? Why not block from IPs and less-than-4-day-old accounts? And you can't block me because I am ''not'' in violation of that dumb "90/10" rule. Yet. [[User:Clv309|Clv309]] 09:41, 23 July 2007 (EDT)
:Yes, I asked a question about locked articles, but I don't see how that could possibly go against me. And there really aren't "so very few of them," the first edit I wanted to make I couldn't even do. I can see why you may feel the need to protect some articles more than others, but why sysop-only? Why not block from IPs and less-than-4-day-old accounts? And you can't block me because I am ''not'' in violation of that dumb "90/10" rule. Yet. [[User:Clv309|Clv309]] 09:41, 23 July 2007 (EDT)
::Here, people have to register to edit, so protecting against IPs is redundant. Apparently the software here is not set up for semi-protection to prevent new accounts from editing. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:49, 23 July 2007 (EDT)