Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 51: Line 51:  
::Unfortunately the doctrine is one that for some reason people refuse to be rational about.  They find comfort in a "divine mystery" that they aren't supposed to understand.
 
::Unfortunately the doctrine is one that for some reason people refuse to be rational about.  They find comfort in a "divine mystery" that they aren't supposed to understand.
 
::Remember that the problem doesn't lie with the Bible it's in the lies about the Bible.  Accept that it is the word of God and pray for guidance in understanding what it ''really'' teaches.  [[User:BibleBrown|BibleBrown]] 22:20, 29 January 2008 (EST)
 
::Remember that the problem doesn't lie with the Bible it's in the lies about the Bible.  Accept that it is the word of God and pray for guidance in understanding what it ''really'' teaches.  [[User:BibleBrown|BibleBrown]] 22:20, 29 January 2008 (EST)
 +
I think it is unfair to imply the trinity is not based on the Bible. Jesus said in Matthew that we are to baptise in the name of the father, the son and the holy spirit. And the doctrine is mentioned in other parts of the Bible.  The divinity of Jesus is shown throughout the gospels(miracles, etc.), letter to hebrews, revelation.  Even if one is skeptical of the truine doctrine, I think there is a logic to it, as scripture shows Jesus to be both man (prophet) and divine (Son of God). Regards, Adam
25

edits

Navigation menu