nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 76:
Line 76: +
Conservapedia talk:Are atheists productive (view source)
Revision as of 02:07, February 28, 2008
, 02:07, February 28, 2008→Google Searches are not a way to quantify data: What't the point?
: I guess that it depends on what you mean by "this context". I did say that they ''can'' be useful, not that they are ''always'' useful, so a single example (or even multiple examples) does not disprove that. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:39, 27 February 2008 (EST)
: I guess that it depends on what you mean by "this context". I did say that they ''can'' be useful, not that they are ''always'' useful, so a single example (or even multiple examples) does not disprove that. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:39, 27 February 2008 (EST)
::Google hits are useful to quantify Google hits (and similar), there isn't much more than that. [[User:Nyflah|Nyflah]] 11:13, 27 February 2008 (EST)
::Google hits are useful to quantify Google hits (and similar), there isn't much more than that. [[User:Nyflah|Nyflah]] 11:13, 27 February 2008 (EST)
::: I've already said that Google hits don't support they way that they are used in this article. Why is there such a determination to make out that they are utterly useless in ''any'' situation? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:07, 27 February 2008 (EST)
== A research proposal ==
== A research proposal ==