83
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 44:
Line 44: + +
Conservapedia talk:Are atheists productive (view source)
Revision as of 00:20, February 29, 2008
, 00:20, February 29, 2008no edit summary
::::I hope that remark was not addressed to me. Where is the deliberate ignorance? I am trying to engage with your suggestion, and thinking about whether it is actually possible to carry out meaningful research on your hypothesis, and how one might gather useful data. But I do think that the article in its present state is pretty pointless. [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 12:14, 26 February 2008 (EST)
::::I hope that remark was not addressed to me. Where is the deliberate ignorance? I am trying to engage with your suggestion, and thinking about whether it is actually possible to carry out meaningful research on your hypothesis, and how one might gather useful data. But I do think that the article in its present state is pretty pointless. [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 12:14, 26 February 2008 (EST)
Googling "second generation atheist" gets over 900 hits. Not that it matters because it is <i>google</i>. Really before seeing page site I honestly never have seen the term before. I wonder what exactly is the point of this article? It seems to just be a definition for a rarely used term that anyone with basic English skills would be able to infer. It then makes an unbacked claim based off of "data" made by google in order to insult a broad group of people. I think the whole thing should justed be trashed. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 19:20, 28 February 2008 (EST)
== "The Minister's Son" ==
== "The Minister's Son" ==