Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + + + + + + + +
the idea is important - the number of articles is not
:Er, and it's not so much an article, as a quotation. And there's no category, or bolding. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 10:27, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
:Er, and it's not so much an article, as a quotation. And there's no category, or bolding. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 10:27, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
::Yes, but then Ed would only have 49 articles. Perspective, please, gents. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 15:59, 21 March 2008 (EDT)
::Yes, but then Ed would only have 49 articles. Perspective, please, gents. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 15:59, 21 March 2008 (EDT)
:::Granted that we don't need three separate articles. But "science" != "physical science". Ever here of the [[:Category:Life Sciences]]?
:::Liberals say that the material world is "all there is", and on that basis that contend that "science" must limit itself to study of the natural world. For those who entertain (for the sake of argument) that a supernatural world or a supernatural being might exist, they always insist that its/their operations would be chaotic and arbitrary. (You can't study random stuff, right?)
:::This contradicts the (modern?) Christian view that "an orderly universe makes sense only if it were designed and created by an orderly Creator".
:::Liberal, atheistic thought sneaks in the idea of an insane [[god]] (like [[Zeus]] in a bad mood when some earthly virgin turned him down). They impute insanity and unpredictability to God and His work. We need not accept this view. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:13, 21 March 2008 (EDT)