Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
not the same as
Line 9: Line 9:  
::Yes, but then Ed would only have 49 articles. Perspective, please, gents. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 15:59, 21 March 2008 (EDT)
 
::Yes, but then Ed would only have 49 articles. Perspective, please, gents. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 15:59, 21 March 2008 (EDT)
   −
:::Granted that we don't need three separate articles. But "science" != "physical science". Ever here of the [[:Category:Life Sciences]]?  
+
:::Granted that we don't need three separate articles. But "science" is not the same as "physical science". Ever hear of the [[:Category:Life Sciences]]?  
    
:::Liberals say that the material world is "all there is", and on that basis that contend that "science" must limit itself to study of the natural world. For those who entertain (for the sake of argument) that a supernatural world or a supernatural being might exist, they always insist that its/their operations would be chaotic and arbitrary. (You can't study random stuff, right?)
 
:::Liberals say that the material world is "all there is", and on that basis that contend that "science" must limit itself to study of the natural world. For those who entertain (for the sake of argument) that a supernatural world or a supernatural being might exist, they always insist that its/their operations would be chaotic and arbitrary. (You can't study random stuff, right?)
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu