Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 217: Line 217:     
The definitions lead me to believe that nature is everything we see around us. "The forces and processes that produce and control all the phenomena of the material world: the laws of nature". Thus if God does interact with the world, it is only through the laws of nature that he could, and being only a something external to the empirical universe he would be not be everything but merely a something and thus limited. -[http://www.myspace.com/barnes_ Barnes]
 
The definitions lead me to believe that nature is everything we see around us. "The forces and processes that produce and control all the phenomena of the material world: the laws of nature". Thus if God does interact with the world, it is only through the laws of nature that he could, and being only a something external to the empirical universe he would be not be everything but merely a something and thus limited. -[http://www.myspace.com/barnes_ Barnes]
 +
: Most of your post was argument by incredulity and personal opinion.  God is supposed to be all-knowing, all-powerful, etc. but one characteristic ''not'' used of him is "everything".  So He is not "everything", but that doesn't mean that He is therefore limited.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:59, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
    
==Logical fallacy==
 
==Logical fallacy==
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu