Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:     
::::I think the "no ship" evidence was from a review of New England records, ie American orginating ships.  So, for complete quesswork: could it not be that Europeans took goods to Africa to trade for slaves and then slaves to America to trade for raw materials (Triangular).  Once America had developed enough to produce its own finished goods slavers from America could increase profit by cutting out the middle man (Europe) and deal direct.  --[[User:Toffeeman|Toffeeman]] 13:14, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
 
::::I think the "no ship" evidence was from a review of New England records, ie American orginating ships.  So, for complete quesswork: could it not be that Europeans took goods to Africa to trade for slaves and then slaves to America to trade for raw materials (Triangular).  Once America had developed enough to produce its own finished goods slavers from America could increase profit by cutting out the middle man (Europe) and deal direct.  --[[User:Toffeeman|Toffeeman]] 13:14, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Says who?==
 +
Aschlafly, you appear to have written this.  If you want to make such a statement, shouldn't each point have at least a few citations proving that someone actually makes the arguments that you say are myths?  [[User:LughR|LughR]] 17:01, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
3

edits

Navigation menu