nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14:
Line 14: + +
Talk:National Center for Science Education (view source)
Revision as of 15:13, September 17, 2008
, 15:13, September 17, 2008no edit summary
::: Having said all that, I tend to agree that there is no need in this case to include the word "erroneously". As Horace42 says, 'The article already puts the reader on notice that there might some question as to whether the connection alleged is correct by use of the words "which it contends"'. In this case, I'm inclined to think that is sufficient.
::: Having said all that, I tend to agree that there is no need in this case to include the word "erroneously". As Horace42 says, 'The article already puts the reader on notice that there might some question as to whether the connection alleged is correct by use of the words "which it contends"'. In this case, I'm inclined to think that is sufficient.
::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:32, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:32, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
::::If I were to state that the letters 'M' and 'N' were the same, it is not enough to say that I contend it. It is proper to point out that I am wrong. Our readers come here for truth which oftentimes may be difficult to find on other sites. Similar to a Presidential election where the goal is to win, the ability to portray your opposition as how you wish them to be viewed through unflattering comparisons is an important strategy. Creationism is locked out of the classroom. Unless Intelligent Design is linked to Creationism it would be difficult to justify its suppression, especially since 70% of the United States population is curious and wants it to be taught. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 11:13, 17 September 2008 (EDT)