nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: +
Talk:National Center for Science Education (view source)
Revision as of 10:21, September 18, 2008
, 10:21, September 18, 2008→Unsourced and unencyclopedic: Not a good example.
::::If I were to state that the letters 'M' and 'N' were the same, it is not enough to say that I contend it. It is proper to point out that I am wrong. Our readers come here for truth which oftentimes may be difficult to find on other sites. Similar to a Presidential election where the goal is to win, the ability to portray your opposition as how you wish them to be viewed through unflattering comparisons is an important strategy. Creationism is locked out of the classroom. Unless Intelligent Design is linked to Creationism it would be difficult to justify its suppression, especially since 70% of the United States population is curious and wants it to be taught. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 11:13, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
::::If I were to state that the letters 'M' and 'N' were the same, it is not enough to say that I contend it. It is proper to point out that I am wrong. Our readers come here for truth which oftentimes may be difficult to find on other sites. Similar to a Presidential election where the goal is to win, the ability to portray your opposition as how you wish them to be viewed through unflattering comparisons is an important strategy. Creationism is locked out of the classroom. Unless Intelligent Design is linked to Creationism it would be difficult to justify its suppression, especially since 70% of the United States population is curious and wants it to be taught. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 11:13, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
::::: That's really not a good example, as everyone knows that M and N are not the same. Therefore it definitely ''would'' be enough to say that you contend it. Even if not everyone did know it, I still think that it is enough to say that you contend it. And I say this despite totally agreeing with your last two sentences. I also agree that Conservapedia should say that they are not the same, but ID and creationism articles are sufficient for that. My point is that it does not need to be said in ''this'' article. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:21, 18 September 2008 (EDT)