Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + +
Revival of the “Fairness Doctrine” would have the chilling effect of censoring conservative talk radio by requiring radio stations to air liberal content.
[[Liberal]]s inevitably demand censorship of ideas that challenge their views. This is especially true in the most its most extreme political manifestation, [[communism]].
[[Liberal]]s inevitably demand censorship of ideas that challenge their views. This is especially true in the most its most extreme political manifestation, [[communism]].
The NRSC makes this claim:
*Realizing that their ideas couldn't compete in the Free Market, Democrats schemed for ways to crush conservative talk radio's success. Their answer? The so-called “Fairness Doctrine.” Revival of the “Fairness Doctrine” would have the chilling effect of censoring conservative talk radio by requiring radio stations to air liberal content. Air liberal content or your station license will be revoked. It's unfortunate that Democrats are willing to trample on our First Amendment rights for political gain.<ref>[http://www.nrsc.org/CostOfDemocrats/StopLiberalCensorship/ NRSC petition]</ref>
Liberals charge that [[Conservative]]s also censor when they can. An example some{{weasel}} give is Conservapedia. They say that edits that disagree with the prevailing conservative viewpoint here regularly lead to a block.
Liberals charge that [[Conservative]]s also censor when they can. An example some{{weasel}} give is Conservapedia. They say that edits that disagree with the prevailing conservative viewpoint here regularly lead to a block.
==Notes==
<references />