Talk:Liberal censorship

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

I reverted the "censorship". Now make your case. ... Okay, I waited but no one is addressing the issue of whether liberals are using censorship to suppress opposing views.

I'm going to move the counteraccusation to a debate page. --Ed Poor Talk 12:11, 25 November 2008 (EST)

Ed, I appreciate your reversion of my reversion. But my reading of that is that TK says we might block when opposing views are parotted and nauseam, ie the block is for disruptive editing and arguing just to delay and undermine CP, rather than being an ideological block. therefore the inference by the person who made the accusation was incorrect so I reverted it and I blocked her for untruth. if you disagree with me you may wish to unblock also. cheers, Bugler 12:16, 25 November 2008 (EST)
The question is, who are the real censors? I think we can make a case that it is liberals. The counteraccusation is a mere distraction. It's like liberals, socialists and communists who dismiss all criticism of Communist genocide and focus on their allegation that Pinochet murdered 3 thousand political opponents in Chile. It's a distraction, because even if all 3 thousand people who disappeared were "murdered" by the government, it's unrelated to the murder of over 30 million people by the Communist governments of China and USSR.
Two wrongs do not make a right, and one small wrong on one side does not justify a large wrong on the opposite side. --Ed Poor Talk 12:21, 25 November 2008 (EST)

(afterthought) I value TK's input, but he might not represent the founder precisely in this. The question remains, "What is an ideological block?" Let's take this thread to Conservapedia:Ideological blocking, because we've gone far afield from liberal censorship. --Ed Poor Talk 12:28, 25 November 2008 (EST)

Why is there a "Liberal censorship" page and not a "Conservative censorship" page? This seems a bit harsh... --Humph 15:51, 29 May 2009 (EDT)Humph

Liberal totalitarianism

  • The result of pervasive and institutionalized liberal censorship is termed liberal totalitarianism.

Isn't this statement redundant? Wouldn't it imply that if there is such a thing as "liberal totalitarianism", there may exist a converse or alternative form of totalitarianism such as "conservative totalitarianism"? I was of the mind or impression that conservativism stands in direct opposition to all forms of totalitarianism. Rob Smith 14:41, 14 August 2011 (EDT)

Jefferson quote

  • No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.

I am actually not sure if this quote from Jefferson is true or not but in this article it is said this is true while in Gun control quotes article, it is said that it is a fake... --ARamis 23:32, 4 September 2011 (EDT)

Potential examples

At the bottom of this article, it states that Greta Thunberg threatened to leave Facebook if it did not censor her critics. --1990'sguy (talk) 08:50, 13 November 2019 (EST)