| Line 54: |
Line 54: |
| | | | |
| | *americanthinker.com (medium-to-low, not much on social issues) | | *americanthinker.com (medium-to-low, not much on social issues) |
| − | *breitbart.com (low, much of it repeating honest news sources; political coverage dominated by foreign policy issues) | + | *breitbart.com (low, much of it repeating liberal news sources; political coverage dominated by foreign policy issues) |
| | *canadafreepress.com | | *canadafreepress.com |
| | *catholicedition.com (has lots of quantity not allowed by [[lamestream media]]) | | *catholicedition.com (has lots of quantity not allowed by [[lamestream media]]) |
| Line 91: |
Line 91: |
| | *educational | | *educational |
| | *includes social issues | | *includes social issues |
| − | *does not play favorites among conservative individuals | + | *does not play favorites among individuals |
| − | *does not waste time and energy on reality | + | *does not waste time and energy on [[gossip]] |
| − | *conservative bias (any source that reports news as it happens, even if the facts are detrimental to conservative arguments, is ineligible) | + | *factual accuracy<ref>"Factual accuracy," per [[Conservapedia|Conservapedia's]] [[Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style#Citing_Sources_and_Using_Footnotes|Manual of Style]]: ''"The party affiliation of a news source should be irrelevant. All that matters is whether the source has a record of telling the truth."''</ref> |
| | *does not rely on offensive, non-family-friendly material to boost traffic | | *does not rely on offensive, non-family-friendly material to boost traffic |
| | *informs as well as attracting interest | | *informs as well as attracting interest |