21
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: +
Talk:Grove City College (view source)
Revision as of 03:49, February 26, 2011
, 03:49, February 26, 2011no edit summary
::I agree with the above (albeit somewhat old) concern, and am concerned that other parts of this read a bit like promotional material for the school. For example, is the math program really "superb"? The slim course offerings, small faculty, and middling Putnam finishes (most recently 99th) suggest that even "mediocre" might overstate the case. It seems comparable to other schools its size, and inferior to even the poorer state schools. At least some clarification of the ways in which these programs are superb would be useful. --[[User:DanN|DanN]] 22:37, 25 February 2011 (EST)
::I agree with the above (albeit somewhat old) concern, and am concerned that other parts of this read a bit like promotional material for the school. For example, is the math program really "superb"? The slim course offerings, small faculty, and middling Putnam finishes (most recently 99th) suggest that even "mediocre" might overstate the case. It seems comparable to other schools its size, and inferior to even the poorer state schools. At least some clarification of the ways in which these programs are superb would be useful. --[[User:DanN|DanN]] 22:37, 25 February 2011 (EST)
:::It's a conservative school but you need specifics. Hmmm. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:42, 25 February 2011 (EST)
:::It's a conservative school but you need specifics. Hmmm. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:42, 25 February 2011 (EST)
::::I don't care if it's conservative or liberal. If the article for the Karl Marx Academy said it had a "superb" math program when in fact it is at best third-rate, I'd complain about that too. Anyone mind if I remove the misleading claims? --[[User:DanN|DanN]] 22:49, 25 February 2011 (EST)