Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
redundant
Line 11: Line 11:     
Why is there a "Liberal censorship" page and not a "Conservative censorship" page? This seems a bit harsh... --[[User:Humph|Humph]] 15:51, 29 May 2009 (EDT)Humph
 
Why is there a "Liberal censorship" page and not a "Conservative censorship" page? This seems a bit harsh... --[[User:Humph|Humph]] 15:51, 29 May 2009 (EDT)Humph
 +
 +
==Liberal totalitarianism==
 +
*''The result of pervasive and institutionalized liberal censorship is termed liberal totalitarianism.''
 +
Isn't this statement redundant? Wouldn't it imply that if there is such a thing as "liberal totalitarianism", there may exist a converse or alternative form of [[totalitarianism]] such as "conservative totalitarianism"? I was of the mind or impression that [[conservativism]] stands in direct opposition to all forms of totalitarianism.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:41, 14 August 2011 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,413

edits

Navigation menu