Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:     
::::::::::@ CraigF - 1) I know you won't provide one, because you dislike actual references and real research, but I would ''love'' to see a cite stating that "most liberals keep quiet about their support for inter species marriage". 2) Stop making arguments personal. You normally attack the user, not the argument. Turn that around, because you're pushing the boundaries of civility. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 16:20, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
 
::::::::::@ CraigF - 1) I know you won't provide one, because you dislike actual references and real research, but I would ''love'' to see a cite stating that "most liberals keep quiet about their support for inter species marriage". 2) Stop making arguments personal. You normally attack the user, not the argument. Turn that around, because you're pushing the boundaries of civility. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 16:20, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
:::::::::::The issue isn't necessarily what a liberal would want to define marriage as. It is the fact that it is a liberal position that marriage can be defined as anything the government wants. Do most liberals support legalization of marriage between a man and a beast? No. Do most liberals support the idea that marriage between a man and a beast could be legalized? Yes. Perhaps this differentiation may help unite the two sides of this debate.--[[User:GrahamB|GrahamB]] 16:46, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
111

edits

Navigation menu