30
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 25:
Line 25: + +
Talk:Conservative Dictionary Project (M) (view source)
Revision as of 20:50, September 7, 2011
, 20:50, September 7, 2011→"liberals want to define marriage as anything they want"
::::::::::@ CraigF - 1) I know you won't provide one, because you dislike actual references and real research, but I would ''love'' to see a cite stating that "most liberals keep quiet about their support for inter species marriage". 2) Stop making arguments personal. You normally attack the user, not the argument. Turn that around, because you're pushing the boundaries of civility. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 16:20, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
::::::::::@ CraigF - 1) I know you won't provide one, because you dislike actual references and real research, but I would ''love'' to see a cite stating that "most liberals keep quiet about their support for inter species marriage". 2) Stop making arguments personal. You normally attack the user, not the argument. Turn that around, because you're pushing the boundaries of civility. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 16:20, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
:::::::::::The issue isn't necessarily what a liberal would want to define marriage as. It is the fact that it is a liberal position that marriage can be defined as anything the government wants. Do most liberals support legalization of marriage between a man and a beast? No. Do most liberals support the idea that marriage between a man and a beast could be legalized? Yes. Perhaps this differentiation may help unite the two sides of this debate.--[[User:GrahamB|GrahamB]] 16:46, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
:::::::::::The issue isn't necessarily what a liberal would want to define marriage as. It is the fact that it is a liberal position that marriage can be defined as anything the government wants. Do most liberals support legalization of marriage between a man and a beast? No. Do most liberals support the idea that marriage between a man and a beast could be legalized? Yes. Perhaps this differentiation may help unite the two sides of this debate.--[[User:GrahamB|GrahamB]] 16:46, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
::::::::::::Sharon, thank you for your attempt at getting Craig to argue the actual issues. You seem to be one of the more responsible people here on the site and I appreciate you maintaining the voice of reason.
::::::::::::Craig, again, I would like you to clarify your positions on animal husbandry. I will admit that this is a trick question, but still, I really wish you would simply answer my one simple question: Do you suppoort Animal Husbandry or not?