SkipCaptcha
441
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 43:
Line 43: +
Talk:Conservative Dictionary Project (M) (view source)
Revision as of 22:54, September 7, 2011
, 22:54, September 7, 2011→Craig, please stop reinserting the same edit.
:Here, is your documentation: [http://www.thesharkguys.com/lists/7-pro-polygamy-arguments/], [http://www.2wives.com/], [http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/12/pro-polygamy-economist-discovers-that-polygamy-has-institutionalized-women-into-subservience.html
:Here, is your documentation: [http://www.thesharkguys.com/lists/7-pro-polygamy-arguments/], [http://www.2wives.com/], [http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/12/pro-polygamy-economist-discovers-that-polygamy-has-institutionalized-women-into-subservience.html
], [http://www.nambla.com]. Let's drop it. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 18:51, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
], [http://www.nambla.com]. Let's drop it. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 18:51, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
::I had links to site promoting child marriage, but I don't think Conservapedia allows them. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 18:54, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
==Minutemen==
==Minutemen==
I would love to see documentation that proves that liberals ignore minutemen. I'm as liberal as they come and I've never once doubted the importance of the minutemen in the Revolution.
I would love to see documentation that proves that liberals ignore minutemen. I'm as liberal as they come and I've never once doubted the importance of the minutemen in the Revolution.