233
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 44:
Line 44: +
Talk:Conservative Dictionary Project (M) (view source)
Revision as of 22:56, September 7, 2011
, 22:56, September 7, 2011→Craig, please stop reinserting the same edit.
], [http://www.nambla.com]. Let's drop it. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 18:51, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
], [http://www.nambla.com]. Let's drop it. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 18:51, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
::I had links to site promoting child marriage, but I don't think Conservapedia allows them. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 18:54, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
::I had links to site promoting child marriage, but I don't think Conservapedia allows them. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 18:54, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
::Alright, so ONE PERSON--who is never identified as a liberal or as having any other political ideology--wrote a thesis THIRTY YEARS ago which she has SINCE DISAVOWED. Where is the support for your contention? Did you read as far as the part where it says "Now, having written several books on the economics of marriage, Grossbard says, "I know better."." Try again. [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 18:56, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
==Minutemen==
==Minutemen==
I would love to see documentation that proves that liberals ignore minutemen. I'm as liberal as they come and I've never once doubted the importance of the minutemen in the Revolution.
I would love to see documentation that proves that liberals ignore minutemen. I'm as liberal as they come and I've never once doubted the importance of the minutemen in the Revolution.