Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,387
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − +
Talk:Richard Dawkins' Elevatorgate comments (view source)
Revision as of 01:49, September 25, 2011
, 01:49, September 25, 2011no edit summary
While the notability of the 'elevatorgate' incident is questionable enough, there is certainly no need to go making an entirely separate article about the comments made by Richard Dawkins about it. [[User:DavidZa|DavidZa]] 21:37, 24 September 2011 (EDT)
While the notability of the 'elevatorgate' incident is questionable enough, there is certainly no need to go making an entirely separate article about the comments made by Richard Dawkins about it. [[User:DavidZa|DavidZa]] 21:37, 24 September 2011 (EDT)
:::Are you a fan of Richard Dawkins? Could this be influencing your decision to not want Dawkins remarks highlighted? Skeptic [[David Allen Green]] is of the opinion that the Elevatorgate scandal was notable. Plus, it was covered by some major press outlets. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:46, 24 September 2011 (EDT)
:::Are you a fan of Richard Dawkins? Could this be influencing your decision to not want Dawkins remarks highlighted? Skeptic [[David Allen Green]] is of the opinion that the Elevatorgate scandal was notable. Plus, it was covered by some major press outlets. Lastly, I do think it is easier for the reader to not have to read the entire initial comments and then Dawkins subsequent explanation which made things worse in the main article. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:46, 24 September 2011 (EDT)