Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
1,924
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 32:
Line 32: − − − − − == Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry… == − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − JsEsNsSeEsN − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes. − − − p.p.s. PhilipN - keep it up, boy! − − − == Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry… == − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − JsEsNsSeEsN − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes. − − − p.p.s. PhilipN - keep it up, boy! − − − − == Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry… == − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − JsEsNsSeEsN − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes. − − − p.p.s. PhilipN - keep it up, boy!
Reverted edits by JenDMer (talk) to last revision by PhilipN
Alright. For that, I will refrain from vandalizing. The thing I am trying to achieve is the realization that until people decide to work together instead of warring, that nothing is truly going to be accomplished. However, this is a large goal, I admit. [[User:Mangoluv|Mangoluv]] 16:16, 2 January 2012 (EST)
Alright. For that, I will refrain from vandalizing. The thing I am trying to achieve is the realization that until people decide to work together instead of warring, that nothing is truly going to be accomplished. However, this is a large goal, I admit. [[User:Mangoluv|Mangoluv]] 16:16, 2 January 2012 (EST)
:Good luck with that !--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 16:18, 2 January 2012 (EST)
:Good luck with that !--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 16:18, 2 January 2012 (EST)