14
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32:
Line 32: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Letting you off the hook!
Alright. For that, I will refrain from vandalizing. The thing I am trying to achieve is the realization that until people decide to work together instead of warring, that nothing is truly going to be accomplished. However, this is a large goal, I admit. [[User:Mangoluv|Mangoluv]] 16:16, 2 January 2012 (EST)
Alright. For that, I will refrain from vandalizing. The thing I am trying to achieve is the realization that until people decide to work together instead of warring, that nothing is truly going to be accomplished. However, this is a large goal, I admit. [[User:Mangoluv|Mangoluv]] 16:16, 2 January 2012 (EST)
:Good luck with that !--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 16:18, 2 January 2012 (EST)
:Good luck with that !--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 16:18, 2 January 2012 (EST)
== Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ ==
Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you.
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock.
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!
We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.
May the gods bless your ignorance,
Your servant,
>J.E>N_S<E>N_
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better!