Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1 byte removed ,  05:54, February 14, 2012
m
improved
Line 5: Line 5:  
In some cases liberals stop promoting certain types of alternative energy once it becomes efficient, which suggests that some of the push for green energy is due to an underlying opposition to life-promoting energy.
 
In some cases liberals stop promoting certain types of alternative energy once it becomes efficient, which suggests that some of the push for green energy is due to an underlying opposition to life-promoting energy.
   −
This does not hinder liberals to heavily promote green energy. Even though some forms of generating green energy (for instance via solar cells) actually cost more energy to produce, than they will ever deliver.<br />
+
This does not hinder liberals from heavily promoting green energy. Even though some forms of generating green energy (for instance via solar cells) actually cost more energy to produce, than they will ever deliver.
 +
 
 
Green energy is also (unlike [[nuclear power]]) very unreliable: solar cells need bright weather to produce energy and windmills need wind to produce power. They rely on a climatical variable, while nuclear power relies on the constant of [[nuclear physics]].
 
Green energy is also (unlike [[nuclear power]]) very unreliable: solar cells need bright weather to produce energy and windmills need wind to produce power. They rely on a climatical variable, while nuclear power relies on the constant of [[nuclear physics]].
  
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits

Navigation menu