Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
a response
Line 2: Line 2:     
:Could you make your criticism more specific, please? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:16, 14 July 2012 (EDT)
 
:Could you make your criticism more specific, please? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:16, 14 July 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Why this page is beyond substandard and quite frankly embarrassing:
 +
::* It is not actually an essay. It is actually a collection of captioned pictures and links. In fact, there are no words in it that are not links or captions to pictures.
 +
::* It claims that one's "machismo" is linked to one's preference in peanut butter, despite no link ever being shows between the two.
 +
::* The main thesis, that Richard Dawkins likes creamy peanut butter, has never been proven anywhere.
 +
::* Other main points of this piece, like the claims that Chuck Norris and John Wayne enjoy/enjoyed chunky peanut butter, have never been proven.
 +
::* Large components of it, namely the bunny and bullfighting pictures, have been used in countless other "essays" by User:Conservative and don't really prove anything.
 +
::Ed Poor, if you can't see that this page is an utter embarassment to the readers and editors of Conservapedia, then I don't know what else to say. I am interested in hearing your defense of this article. [[User:AndrewTompkins|AndrewTompkins]] 11:20, 14 July 2012 (EDT)

Navigation menu