Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + + + + + +
Talk:Essay: Richard Dawkins and peanut butter (view source)
Revision as of 16:33, July 14, 2012
, 16:33, July 14, 2012no sense of humoR?
::* Large components of it, namely the bunny and bullfighting pictures, have been used in countless other "essays" by User:Conservative and don't really prove anything.
::* Large components of it, namely the bunny and bullfighting pictures, have been used in countless other "essays" by User:Conservative and don't really prove anything.
::Ed Poor, if you can't see that this page is an utter embarassment to the readers and editors of Conservapedia, then I don't know what else to say. I am interested in hearing your defense of this article. [[User:AndrewTompkins|AndrewTompkins]] 11:20, 14 July 2012 (EDT)
::Ed Poor, if you can't see that this page is an utter embarassment to the readers and editors of Conservapedia, then I don't know what else to say. I am interested in hearing your defense of this article. [[User:AndrewTompkins|AndrewTompkins]] 11:20, 14 July 2012 (EDT)
:::I agree that it's not actually an essay. It looks like a joke: i.e., the page author is probably using it to tease atheists.
:::Please don't respond as if you think it wasn't meant humorously. There's no "thesis"; he's just kidding around.
:::You may wonder whether kidding and teasing atheists will promote Conservapedia's cause. But if you can't tell it was comedic material, there's probably no point discussing it further. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:33, 14 July 2012 (EDT)