Talk:Biden's age
A link from either MPR or MPL should help, too. RobSDe Plorabus Unum 20:09, 24 August 2019 (EDT)
- This could be interesting in mainspace.
- Feel free to add to the article. Also, this article needs to be created: Joe Biden's age vs. Donald Trump's age.
- It would be great if Conservapedia ranked #1 for this search at the major search engines and was the go to source of information on this topic. Due to American's diet, exercise habits and a medical system that can help people live longer, Alzheimer's disease is the #2 killer of Americans. The Japanese are far less likely to suffer cognitive decline because they eat more fish and eat less meat/dairy.Conservative (talk) 09:24, 25 August 2019 (EDT)
- How about a subsection on age-related gaffes? This is from just yesterday. RobSDe Plorabus Unum 11:49, 25 August 2019 (EDT)
- It would be great if Conservapedia ranked #1 for this search at the major search engines and was the go to source of information on this topic. Due to American's diet, exercise habits and a medical system that can help people live longer, Alzheimer's disease is the #2 killer of Americans. The Japanese are far less likely to suffer cognitive decline because they eat more fish and eat less meat/dairy.Conservative (talk) 09:24, 25 August 2019 (EDT)
- ↑ Does Joe Biden Have Butt Hair on His Head?, By Jessica Pressler, The Intelligencer, Aug. 25, 2008.
Right now, I got Biden's age at #32 on Google, ahead of CBS, LA Times, Political Wire, Reuters, NBC, and Biden's own Twitter account. It's up from a few days ago at #35. RobSDe Plorabus Unum 13:20, 9 September 2019 (EDT)
- it's up to #23. RobSDe Plorabus Unum 14:51, 13 September 2019 (EDT)
- 4 keys to getting the article ranked high at Google. 1) Have all the material focus on Biden's age. Google and the public both look for relevancy 2) Pick articles that rank high at Google that are relevant to Biden's age unless it's a relevant and noteworthy exception such as his hair, medical info related to a matter, etc. 3) Use as authoritative sources as possible. 4) Avoid including unflattering pictures of a person. People like pleasing pictures and if you break this rule, readers will see the use of an unflattering picture as a sign of bias. Obviously, if there is a picture that doesn't break copyright rules that can be used to illustrate a relevant point then that this an exception (bloody eye, etc.).This is the reason I uploaded a new picture of Julian Castro.Conservative (talk) 16:14, 13 September 2019 (EDT)
- Why should someone pretend to be unbiased when they really are? Seems hypocritical. For example, AOC's official Congressional picture; she is anything but a dignified member of Congress. RobSDe Plorabus Unum 16:36, 13 September 2019 (EDT)
- Dictionary.com definies bias as: "Bias, prejudice mean a strong inclination of the mind or a preconceived opinion about something or someone. A bias may be favorable or unfavorable: bias in favor of or against an idea. Prejudice implies a preformed judgment even more unreasoning than bias, and usually implies an unfavorable opinion." I realize that nobody is a blank slate, but at the same time, it is important to go where the evidence leads and to avoid biases/preformed judgments when making decisions.Conservative (talk) 22:48, 13 September 2019 (EDT)
- This page is what Wikipedia defines as an "Attack page", it is created for no other reason than to attack.
- Google 'Bowling Green massacre' for instance; the page obviously violates WP's No Attack page policy, yet still exists. RobSDe Plorabus Unum
- Dictionary.com definies bias as: "Bias, prejudice mean a strong inclination of the mind or a preconceived opinion about something or someone. A bias may be favorable or unfavorable: bias in favor of or against an idea. Prejudice implies a preformed judgment even more unreasoning than bias, and usually implies an unfavorable opinion." I realize that nobody is a blank slate, but at the same time, it is important to go where the evidence leads and to avoid biases/preformed judgments when making decisions.Conservative (talk) 22:48, 13 September 2019 (EDT)
- Why should someone pretend to be unbiased when they really are? Seems hypocritical. For example, AOC's official Congressional picture; she is anything but a dignified member of Congress. RobSDe Plorabus Unum 16:36, 13 September 2019 (EDT)
- 4 keys to getting the article ranked high at Google. 1) Have all the material focus on Biden's age. Google and the public both look for relevancy 2) Pick articles that rank high at Google that are relevant to Biden's age unless it's a relevant and noteworthy exception such as his hair, medical info related to a matter, etc. 3) Use as authoritative sources as possible. 4) Avoid including unflattering pictures of a person. People like pleasing pictures and if you break this rule, readers will see the use of an unflattering picture as a sign of bias. Obviously, if there is a picture that doesn't break copyright rules that can be used to illustrate a relevant point then that this an exception (bloody eye, etc.).This is the reason I uploaded a new picture of Julian Castro.Conservative (talk) 16:14, 13 September 2019 (EDT)
Here is something I read and I try to remember this interesting research:
"Yet the cognitive and behavioral science literature suggests that those who are highly educated, intelligent or rhetorically skilled tend to be significantly less likely than most to revise their beliefs or adjust their positions when confronted with evidence or arguments that contradict their priors. This is because, in virtue of knowing more about the world, or being better at arguing, they are better equipped to punch holes in data or arguments that contradict their prior views or to otherwise make excuses for “sticking to their guns” regardless. And so, they do...
Indeed, research suggests that people with highly refined critical capacities often deploy them to scrutinize others. Hence, those with higher education levels and academic aptitude (college GPA) tend to be less attuned than most to ambiguity, complexity, uncertainty and limitations in their own knowledge -- and less prone to innovative or creative thinking.
That is perhaps because studies show that, compared to the general public, highly educated or intelligent people tend to be more ideological in their thinking, more ideologically rigid and more extreme in their ideological leanings. Highly educated and intelligent people are also more likely to grow obsessed with some moral or political cause. Research suggests that they are more likely to overreact to small shocks, challenges or slights. Other studies have found that, while they are less likely to be prejudiced against others on the basis of things like race, they tend to be more prejudiced than most against those who seem to think differently than they do -- and often look down on those with less education.
In short, many of the biases and distortions to which all people are susceptible seem to be even more pronounced among those who are highly educated or intelligent."[1]Conservative (talk) 22:54, 13 September 2019 (EDT)
- Biden's dentures is currently trending ahead of Biden's age. Something should be added. RobSDe Plorabus Unum 15:32, 14 September 2019 (EDT)
