Talk:Great replacement hoax

There's no reference to Cuck Schumer who recently peddled the hoax. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 19:33, November 23, 2022 (EST)

Ok, so first of all, "cu**"... is not an appropriate word for Conservapedia, let alone to use for a redirect. Secondly, feel free to add information on Schumer since I evidently missed it; I simply started the article. It doesn't seem like the first time he spouts drivel rooted in disturbing history, given that the precedent he cited for the second impeachment against Trump was cited from white supremacist Democratic efforts to impeach and remove William W. Belknap in the 1870s. —LT ^{(The Old Right was right!)} Thursday, 19:41, November 23, 2022 (EST)

Well, let's see if you get any cooperative collaborative help after what you did to the original article. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 20:42, November 23, 2022 (EST)

Personally, I think you jumped the gun. A parallel article, or page move, could have been done later after the article was more fully developed. But you stepped on cooperative collaborative editing. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 20:46, November 23, 2022 (EST)

We already have Great Replacement. This itself is a parallel article that could be merged. It doesn't tell us anything new. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 20:49, November 23, 2022 (EST)

1. REDIRECT Template:Hide collapse

This mainspace has 19 hits and the talk page 38, twice as many. The White replacement mainspace has 82 hits and the talk 182, more than twice as much. Looks like there's some interest in this subject. We may have to merge both pages eventually. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 00:10, November 24, 2022 (EST)

Sounds like a good idea. —LT ^{(The Old Right was right!)} Thursday, 10:57, November 24, 2022 (EST)