Page history
Talk: Benjamin Franklin
October 10, 2009
→Deist vs. Christian: We appreciate that very much, Daniel, and welcome your further contributions.
+143
→Deist vs. Christian
+1,013
March 8, 2009
November 10, 2008
June 4, 2007
May 19, 2007
→Too Much mention of religion
+195
→It all depends how you define deism.: Was Benjamin Franklin a deist?
+131
May 14, 2007
May 9, 2007
→"Ben and Me"
+9
→"Ben and Me"
+257
→"Ben and Me"
+674
→It all depends how you define deism.
+173
→It all depends how you define deism.
+448
→"Ben and Me"
-6
→"Ben and Me"
m+2
→"Ben and Me"
+203
→"Ben and Me"
+476
→Was there a good reason why you eliminated those sourced facts, SharonS?
+884
→It all depends how you define deism.
+74
→"He was not really a deist as liberals claim."
+84
→"He was not really a deist as liberals claim."
+99
→Was there a good reason why you eliminated those sourced facts, SharonS?
+256
→Was there a good reason why you eliminated those sourced facts, SharonS?
+97
→Was there a good reason why you eliminated those sourced facts, SharonS?
+179
→It all depends how you define deism.
+864
→Was there a good reason why you eliminated those sourced facts, SharonS?
+36
→Was there a good reason why you eliminated those sourced facts, SharonS?
+948
→Was there a good reason why you eliminated those sourced facts, SharonS?
+205
→Was there a good reason why you eliminated those sourced facts, SharonS?: Did she do anything other than bring capitalization into conformity with modern usage?
+16
→Was there a good reason why you eliminated those sourced facts, SharonS?
+331
→Was there a good reason why you eliminated those sourced facts, SharonS?
+185
→Was there a good reason why you eliminated those sourced facts, SharonS?
+239
→It all depends how you define deism.
+1,301
→Was there a good reason why you eliminated those sourced facts, SharonS?
+296
→Was there a good reason why you eliminated those sourced facts, SharonS?
m+4
Was there a good reason why you eliminated those sourced facts, SharonS?
+1,013
May 8, 2007
→"He was not really a deist as liberals claim."
+380
→"He was not really a deist as liberals claim."
+1,086
April 20, 2007
→Relevance of Deism: first amendment
m+4
→"He was not really a deist as liberals claim.": Work with me
+179
→"He was not really a deist as liberals claim."
+240
April 17, 2007
March 29, 2007
→Relevance of Deism: raises all sorts of questions
+425
→Too Much mention of religion: Relevance of Deism
m+24
→Too Much mention of religion
+1,731
→Too Much mention of religion: agree with Harmil
+321
→Too Much mention of religion
+883