Difference between revisions of "TalkOrigins Archive"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
 
Creators of Talk.Origin archive articles did not necessarily have scientific credentials, nor was their work peer reviewed. It is used by promoters of [[evolution|evolutionary pseudoscience]] to advocate their antiquated religion. Michael Ruse, evolutionist science philosopher admitted, “Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.”<ref>[http://creation.com/15-questions 15 questions for evolutionists]</ref>  
 
Creators of Talk.Origin archive articles did not necessarily have scientific credentials, nor was their work peer reviewed. It is used by promoters of [[evolution|evolutionary pseudoscience]] to advocate their antiquated religion. Michael Ruse, evolutionist science philosopher admitted, “Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.”<ref>[http://creation.com/15-questions 15 questions for evolutionists]</ref>  
  
−
== Web traffic of Talk.orgins archive ==
+
== Web traffic of Talk.orgins Archive ==
  
 
Conpete: TalkOrigins web traffic from 7/2011 to 7/2012:
 
Conpete: TalkOrigins web traffic from 7/2011 to 7/2012:

Revision as of 08:47, September 20, 2012

Talk.origins Archive is a formerly popular evolutionist website which has lost a significant amount of its web traffic.[1][2]

Commenting on the website's loss of web traffic, a supporter of Creation Ministries International's Question evolution! campaign quipped:

“ Stored under the right conditions, wine tastes better with the passage of time. Apparently, evolutionary speculation and evolutionary propaganda do not age well in the information age.[3] ”

Internet atheism and internet evolutionism have experienced significant declines in web visitors in recent years.[4] In addition, global atheism and agnosticism are losing adherents at present while global Christianity and biblical creationism are experiencing significant growth.

Creators of Talk.Origin archive articles did not necessarily have scientific credentials, nor was their work peer reviewed. It is used by promoters of evolutionary pseudoscience to advocate their antiquated religion. Michael Ruse, evolutionist science philosopher admitted, “Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.”[5]

Web traffic of Talk.orgins Archive

Conpete: TalkOrigins web traffic from 7/2011 to 7/2012:

Talkoriginsorg uv.png

Alexa: TalkOrigins:

Criticisms of Talk Origins Archive

Creationists have a number of criticisms of the Talk.origins archive and a number of them can be found at the True.Origin Archive.[6] CreationWiki has a large amount of material asserting that the Talk.origins Archive material is errant. [7]

See also

Websites opposing TalkOrigins and other criticisms of Talk.Origins

External Links

References