Difference between revisions of "Library of Alexandria"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (wordsmith)
(reorder)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
−
This is the only ancient account that explicitly states what happened to the library. Some historians dismiss this version of events as motivated by bias against Caesar. Whatever motivated Plutarch, the account establishes that the library no longer existed by AD 100, when he was writing.<ref>Plutarch visited Alexandria, so he would certainly have known if the library still existed in his time.</ref> [[Edward Gibbon]] wrote that the library was destroyed by Christian rioters in AD 391. This claim has been repeated in numerous accounts by anti-Christian writers, but it is not supported by any source older than Gibbon.
+
This account was written around AD 100. Plutarch is the only ancient source that explicitly states what happened to the library. As Plutarch visited Alexandria, he would have noticed if the institution still existed in his time. Strabo visited Alexandria in 20 BC and wrote a detailed description of the palace and the the Museum, but he does not mention the library at all.<ref>[http://www.bede.org.uk/library.htm The Mysterious Fate of the Great Library of Alexandria]", ''Bede's Library''</ref>
 +
 
 +
Plutarch transcribes a speech by a supporter of Augustus which includes this accusation: "[Anthony] had bestowed
 +
upon [Cleopatra] the libraries from Pergamum, in which there were 200,000 volumes." Some historians have interpreted this line to suggest that Cleopatra rebuilt the library using these volumes as the basis of a new collection. Others dismiss the entire speech as wartime propaganda. [[Edward Gibbon]] wrote that the library was destroyed by Christian rioters in AD 391. This claim has been repeated in numerous accounts by anti-Christian writers, but it is not supported by any source older than Gibbon.
  
 
The loss of the Library, which contained the original (and sometimes ''only'') copies of most of the ancient world's greatest works of literature, resulted in the decimation of ancient literature, and accounts for the modern paucity of ancient materials. Scholars estimate that historians now have only 1/10th of 1 percent of the ancient world's original source material to rely upon, as an almost exclusive result of the library's destruction.  As an example, among the material lost in the library was a first-hand account of the life of [[Alexander the Great]], written by his general and boyhood friend, [[Ptolemy]]. Historians know of the book's existence by a citation to it in secondary sources.
 
The loss of the Library, which contained the original (and sometimes ''only'') copies of most of the ancient world's greatest works of literature, resulted in the decimation of ancient literature, and accounts for the modern paucity of ancient materials. Scholars estimate that historians now have only 1/10th of 1 percent of the ancient world's original source material to rely upon, as an almost exclusive result of the library's destruction.  As an example, among the material lost in the library was a first-hand account of the life of [[Alexander the Great]], written by his general and boyhood friend, [[Ptolemy]]. Historians know of the book's existence by a citation to it in secondary sources.

Revision as of 05:18, March 16, 2014

A reconstruction of the Great Hall, based on scholarly evidence.

The Library of Alexandria in Egypt, was once the largest library in the world. It is usually assumed to have been founded at the beginning of the 3rd century BC during the reign of Ptolemy II of Egypt after his father had set up the temple of the Muses, the Musaeum.

The Library at Alexandria was conceived largely as an attempt to bring together in Alexandria the whole of the earlier Greek science, art, and literature. At one point the Library held close to 50,000 books.

Plutarch describes how the library burned down in 48 BC when Julius Caesar set fire to his own ships in the harbor of Alexandria:

when the enemy endeavored to cut off his communication by sea, he was forced to divert that danger by setting fire to his own ships, which, after burning the docks, thence spread on and destroyed the great library.[1]

This account was written around AD 100. Plutarch is the only ancient source that explicitly states what happened to the library. As Plutarch visited Alexandria, he would have noticed if the institution still existed in his time. Strabo visited Alexandria in 20 BC and wrote a detailed description of the palace and the the Museum, but he does not mention the library at all.[2]

Plutarch transcribes a speech by a supporter of Augustus which includes this accusation: "[Anthony] had bestowed upon [Cleopatra] the libraries from Pergamum, in which there were 200,000 volumes." Some historians have interpreted this line to suggest that Cleopatra rebuilt the library using these volumes as the basis of a new collection. Others dismiss the entire speech as wartime propaganda. Edward Gibbon wrote that the library was destroyed by Christian rioters in AD 391. This claim has been repeated in numerous accounts by anti-Christian writers, but it is not supported by any source older than Gibbon.

The loss of the Library, which contained the original (and sometimes only) copies of most of the ancient world's greatest works of literature, resulted in the decimation of ancient literature, and accounts for the modern paucity of ancient materials. Scholars estimate that historians now have only 1/10th of 1 percent of the ancient world's original source material to rely upon, as an almost exclusive result of the library's destruction. As an example, among the material lost in the library was a first-hand account of the life of Alexander the Great, written by his general and boyhood friend, Ptolemy. Historians know of the book's existence by a citation to it in secondary sources.

Reference

  1. ↑ Plutarch, Life of Caesar, 49.6.
  2. ↑ The Mysterious Fate of the Great Library of Alexandria", Bede's Library

See also

External links