Difference between revisions of "Gun-free zone"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Added See Also)
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''gun-free zone''' is a place where, by [[law]] or company or other rule, no person may bring a [[gun]] on-site.
+
A '''gun-free zone''' is usually a [[liberal]]-controlled place where, by [[Nanny state]] or [[Police state]] [[gun control]] [[law]] or company or other rule, no person may bring a [[gun]] on-site.
  
The concept of a place where "people can be sure no one has a gun" is now controversial, for a simple reason: the [[United States]] has seen a raft of mass murders, all occurring in such zones.
+
The concept of a place where "people can be sure no one has a gun" has always been absurd, for the simple reason that [[criminal]]s by their nature ''never'' follow laws. The [[United States]], [[Europe]] and most recently [[liberal]] [[Paris]] at [[Charlie Hebdo]]'s offices have seen a number of [[mass murder]]s and [[Muslim]] [[jihad]] [[terrorist]] attacks occurring in such zones.
  
Ironically, the [[Fort Hood]] venue where thirteen soldiers died, was a gun-free zone, per military regulation.
+
Ironically, the [[Fort Hood]] venue where thirteen soldiers died at the hand of a [[Islamic]] terrorist, was a gun-free zone, per [[Clinton Administration]] military regulation.
  
So also was Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, [[Connecticut]].
+
So also was [[Sandy Hook]] Elementary School in Newtown, [[Connecticut]].
  
* When a crazy gunman wants to go on a rampage, where do they choose to go on their rampage? They choose a gun free zone. Columbine was a gun free zone.  So was Virginia Tech and Sandy Hook. [ http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/judson-phillips-cold-hard-truth/2013/sep/16/when-will-we-learn/]
+
* When a crazy gunman wants to go on a rampage, where do they choose to go on their rampage? They choose a gun free zone. [[Columbine]] was a gun free zone.  So was Virginia Tech and Sandy Hook. [ http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/judson-phillips-cold-hard-truth/2013/sep/16/when-will-we-learn/]
  
==See also==
+
==See Also==
 +
* [[Essay:France Pays Dearly - Liberal Gun Control Laws and Gun Free Zones that Welcome Terrorists]]
 +
* [[Gun control quotes]]
 +
* [[National Rifle Association]] - [[Gun Owners of America]] - [[Second Amendment Foundation]]
 +
* [[John Lott]]
 +
* [[Second Amendment]]: [[Self-defense]], [[Home security]], and [[Defense]] against [[Tyranny]]
 
* [[Gun Free Zone app]]
 
* [[Gun Free Zone app]]
 
* [[Second Amendment]]
 
* [[Second Amendment]]
* [[National Rifle Association]]
 
* [[Gun Owners of America]]
 
* [[Second Amendment Foundation]]
 
 
* [[Big government]] [[Welfare state]] leads to [[Nanny state]], leads to [[Police state]]
 
* [[Big government]] [[Welfare state]] leads to [[Nanny state]], leads to [[Police state]]
 
* [[Liberal totalitarianism]]
 
* [[Liberal totalitarianism]]
  
[[Category:Gun control]]
+
[[Category : Gun control]]
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]
+
[[Category : Anti Second Amendment]]
 +
[[Category : Liberalism]]
 +
[[Category : Police State]]
 +
[[Category : Socialism]]

Revision as of 22:20, January 12, 2015

A gun-free zone is usually a liberal-controlled place where, by Nanny state or Police state gun control law or company or other rule, no person may bring a gun on-site.

The concept of a place where "people can be sure no one has a gun" has always been absurd, for the simple reason that criminals by their nature never follow laws. The United States, Europe and most recently liberal Paris at Charlie Hebdo's offices have seen a number of mass murders and Muslim jihad terrorist attacks occurring in such zones.

Ironically, the Fort Hood venue where thirteen soldiers died at the hand of a Islamic terrorist, was a gun-free zone, per Clinton Administration military regulation.

So also was Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

See Also