Difference between revisions of "Atheism and reason"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 18: Line 18:
 
*[http://fidedubitandum.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/atheism-and-the-inability-to-think/ Atheism and the Inability to Think]
 
*[http://fidedubitandum.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/atheism-and-the-inability-to-think/ Atheism and the Inability to Think]
 
*[http://www.apologetics315.com/2012/11/book-review-cs-lewiss-dangerous-idea-in.html Book Review: C.S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason by Victor Reppert]
 
*[http://www.apologetics315.com/2012/11/book-review-cs-lewiss-dangerous-idea-in.html Book Review: C.S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason by Victor Reppert]
−
<br />
 
  
 
== Atheist worldview cannot explain consciousness ==
 
== Atheist worldview cannot explain consciousness ==

Revision as of 20:42, May 28, 2015

Atheism/naturalism and reason are incompatible and believing in naturalism is therefore self-defeating. In short, if naturalism is true, then we ought not to trust our capacity for reason for the human brain would be a byproduct of blind/unintelligent natural forces. [1]

C.S. Lewis's argument for reason and for the irrationality of materialism

Atheist worldview cannot explain consciousness

The atheist worldview cannot explain the existence of consciousness either and the theistic worldview can offer a reasonable explanation.[2]

Advocates of mind uploading (Mind uploading is the notion that someday mankind may be able to scan and upload their minds to computer storage mediums) are generally strong advocates of cryonics as well.[3] Mind uploading is not a feasible hypothesis.[4] See also: Atheism and cryonics


See also