Difference between revisions of "Sexual harassment"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Sexual harassment''' is an unwelcome sexual advance made by an [[employer]] or superior, especially when compliance is made a condition of continued [[employment]] or advancement (''quid pro quo'' harassment). Courts have also held that a "hostile work environment" can constitute sexual harassment.  It is an abuse of [[power]] and should be avoided. Many companies offer mandatory training to teach employees about the dangers of sexual harassment, because current law holds companies legally and financially [[liable]] for sexual harassment performed by its employees.
 
'''Sexual harassment''' is an unwelcome sexual advance made by an [[employer]] or superior, especially when compliance is made a condition of continued [[employment]] or advancement (''quid pro quo'' harassment). Courts have also held that a "hostile work environment" can constitute sexual harassment.  It is an abuse of [[power]] and should be avoided. Many companies offer mandatory training to teach employees about the dangers of sexual harassment, because current law holds companies legally and financially [[liable]] for sexual harassment performed by its employees.
 +
 +
== See also ==
 +
 +
*[[Sexual harassment at atheist conferences]]
  
 
[[Category:Crimes]]
 
[[Category:Crimes]]

Revision as of 17:15, February 5, 2016

Sexual harassment is an unwelcome sexual advance made by an employer or superior, especially when compliance is made a condition of continued employment or advancement (quid pro quo harassment). Courts have also held that a "hostile work environment" can constitute sexual harassment. It is an abuse of power and should be avoided. Many companies offer mandatory training to teach employees about the dangers of sexual harassment, because current law holds companies legally and financially liable for sexual harassment performed by its employees.

See also