Difference between revisions of "Trump Supreme Court"
(→The full list of candidates: added more information) |
(→Pro-Religion decisions: Hardiman's dissent) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
=== Pro-Religion decisions === | === Pro-Religion decisions === | ||
| − | *''Busch v. Marple Newtown Sch. Dist.'', 567 F.3d 89 (3d Cir. 2009) (Hardiman, J., dissenting) | + | *''Busch v. Marple Newtown Sch. Dist.'', 567 F.3d 89 (3d Cir. 2009) (Hardiman, J., dissenting to object to the censorship by an elementary public school of reading from the [[Bible]] as part of a "show and tell" activity) |
*''Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius'', 723 F.3d 1114 (10th Cir. 2013) (Tymkovich, J.) (an en banc decision in favor of Hobby Lobby) | *''Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius'', 723 F.3d 1114 (10th Cir. 2013) (Tymkovich, J.) (an en banc decision in favor of Hobby Lobby) | ||
Revision as of 04:12, November 24, 2016
The Trump Supreme Court depends on a good analysis of candidates in order to avoid making a mistake. Donald Trump wants to appoint judges like Antonin Scalia, and has said so publicly. But some of the judges given to Trump by the Heritage Foundation and Federalist Society fall far short of that standard, and could even be future liberals if appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Abortion
Which of the candidates ruled for the pro-abortion side, or cited pro-abortion rulings favorably?
Judge Steven Colloton is not pro-life
Judge Colloton is not pro-life, and has ruled twice in favor of the pro-abortion side.
In a long-running case from South Dakota, Judge Colloton refused to join Judge Gruender's decision in favor of a pro-life South Dakota law. Planned Parenthood Minn. v. Rounds, 686 F.3d 889 (8th Cir. 2012). Instead, Colloton wrote a concurrence that basically gutted the value of the pro-life South Dakota law in two ways, while purportedly concurring with the outcome.
The South Dakota law required abortionists to disclose to patients that there is a higher rate of suicide by women who had abortions than those who do not. This is an indisputable fact that should be disclosed.
Judge Colloton, however, insisted that abortionists should only have to disclose the connection between abortion and suicide that is reported in peer-reviewed medical journals, which of course are controlled by pro-aborts. So that ends up being nothing to disclose.
But that evisceration of the law was not even enough for Judge Colloton. He further said that an abortionist can supplement his disclosure with any opinion that the abortionist wants to provide about the issue in his "professional judgment." Of course, that's the same trick that the abortion industry has been using for decades, to have unlimited authority to tell and do to patients whatever they want.
In another abortion case before Judge Colloton, he joined a decision in favor of Planned Parenthood and against a pro-life Nebraska law. Planned Parenthood of the Heartland v. Heineman, 664 F.3d 716 (8th Cir. 2011).
Judge Bill Pryor
Judge Pryor cited favorably a pro-abortion decision that is used in many pro-abortion rulings:
- Cf. Singleton v. Wulff, 428 U.S. 106, 114, 96 S. Ct. 2868, 2874, 49 L. Ed. 2d 826 (1976) (holding that doctors in abortion clinics had standing to challenge a city ordinance that impinged on a woman's right to an abortion) - quoted favorably by Judge Bill Pryor in Camp Legal Def. Fund, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 451 F.3d 1257, 1272 (11th Cir. 2006).
Religion
Issues under the Establishment Clause or Free Exercise Clause are highly correlated with a judge's views on abortion. For example, almost never does a judge rule against a Christian display or expression, but then rule in favor of a pro-life position.
These candidates have ruled against the Christian side in issues of religion:
<list and explanation>
Pro-Religion decisions
- Busch v. Marple Newtown Sch. Dist., 567 F.3d 89 (3d Cir. 2009) (Hardiman, J., dissenting to object to the censorship by an elementary public school of reading from the Bible as part of a "show and tell" activity)
- Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius, 723 F.3d 1114 (10th Cir. 2013) (Tymkovich, J.) (an en banc decision in favor of Hobby Lobby)
Bill Pryor
Judge Bill Pryor has repeatedly ruled or acted against Christians:
- in Keeton v. Anderson-Wiley, 664 F.3d 865 (11th Cir. 2011) (Pryor, J., concurring), joined a decision against a student counselor who was being compelled by a state school to enroll in remediation because her Christian faith led her to question several assertions in the homosexual agenda.
- was the prosecutor in asserting judicial supremacy against Justice Roy Moore in pursuing the liberal agenda to remove him from the Alabama Supreme Court for displaying the Ten Commandments. Specifically, in 2003 Pryor demanded the removal of Justice Moore from the Alabama Supreme Court for defying a federal court order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the state Judicial Building. Pryor himself prosecuted Moore for allegedly violating the Canons of Judicial Ethics by keeping the Ten Commandments on display.
Marine court-martialed for Bible verse
- Margaret Ryan wrote the decision that court-martialed a Marine for displaying a Bible verse.[1]
Second Amendment
Support for the Second Amendment is greater than support for pro-life, but the issues are highly correlated as both concern the inherent right of self-defense. These candidates have ruled against the Second Amendment in some way:
Pro-Second Amendment
Judge Hardiman has written two pro-Second Amendment dissents on the Third Circuit
- Drake v. Filko, 724 F.3d 426 (3d Cir. 2013) (Hardiman, J., dissenting)
- Binderup v. AG of United States, 836 F.3d 336 (3d Cir. 2016) (has interpreted D.C. v. Heller to hold that any law barring persons with Second Amendment rights from possessing lawful firearms in the home even for self-defense is per se unconstitutional, such that no scrutiny is applicable)
The full list of candidates
| candidate | current position | age | confirmation vote | comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keith Blackwell | Georgia supreme court | 41 | probably too young at this time to be appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court | |
| Charles T. Canady | Florida supreme court | 62 | former congressman who coined the expression "partial-birth abortion," in sponsoring the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act | |
| Steven Colloton | US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit | 53 | ruled twice in favor of the pro-abortion side (see above) | |
| Allison Eid | Colorado Supreme Court | 51 | former clerk for Clarence Thomas | |
| Neil Gorsuch | US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit | 49 | ||
| Raymond Gruender | US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit | 53 | ||
| Thomas Hardiman | US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit | 51 | ||
| Raymond Kethledge | US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit | 50 (in Dec.) | ||
| Joan Larsen | Michigan Supreme Court | 47 | faculty member at a liberal law school, the University of Michigan[2] | |
| Sen. Mike Lee | Senator R-Utah | |||
| Thomas Lee | Utah Supreme Court | |||
| Edward Mansfield | Iowa Supreme Court | wrote a controversial decision in favor of a right to fire a woman for being sexually attracted to her | ||
| Federico Moreno | Southern District of Florida | unlikely pick from the position of a trial rather than appellate court judge | ||
| William Pryor | US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 54 | 53-45, with Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski abstaining | prosecuted Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore for an alleged ethics violation due to having the Ten Commandments on display |
| Margaret Ryan | US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces | 52 | she wrote the recent decision that court-martialed a Marine for having a Bible verse displayed on her desk, which suggests a hostility or insensitivity by Ryan to religious beliefs | |
| David Stras | Minnesota Supreme Court | 42 | probably too young at this time to be appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court, he is a former clerk for Justice Clarence Thomas | |
| Diane Sykes | US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit | 59 (in Dec.) | 70-27[3] | ruled in favor of Planned Parenthood in blocking an Indiana law that attempted to cut off funding to it under the Medicaid law. Planned Parenthood of Ind., Inc. v. Comm'r of the Ind. State Dep't of Health, 699 F.3d 962 (7th Cir. 2012). |
| Amul Thapar | Eastern District of Kentucky | unlikely pick from the position of a trial rather than appellate court judge | ||
| Timothy Tymkovich | US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit | 60 | held in favor of religious liberty in Hobby Lobby decision | |
| Don Willett | Texas Supreme Court | 50 | outspokenly anti-Trump at one point | |
| Robert Young | Michigan Supreme Court | 66 (in Jan.) |
References
- ↑ http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/11/military-high-court-religious-liberty-law-not-protect-displaying-bible-verses/
- ↑ https://www.law.umich.edu/FacultyBio/Pages/FacultyBio.aspx?FacID=jllarsen
- ↑ http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=108&session=2&vote=00152