Difference between revisions of "Evidential apologetics"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 27: Line 27:
 
== Evidential apologetics and non-Christian views ==
 
== Evidential apologetics and non-Christian views ==
  
−
Evidential apologetics also incorporates evidence showing the falsity/improbability of non-Christian [[worldview]]s. For example, Dr. Don Batten has an article on the [[origin of life]] which demonstrates the vexing problem first life is for those who insist that life arose through purely natural processes<ref>[http://creation.com/origin-of-life Origin of life] by Dr. Don Batten</ref> See also: [[Philosophical naturalism]]
+
Evidential apologetics also incorporates evidence showing the falsity/improbability of non-Christian [[worldview]]s. For example, Dr. Don Batten wrote an article on the [[origin of life]] which demonstrates the vexing problem first life is for those who insist that life arose through purely natural processes<ref>[http://creation.com/origin-of-life Origin of life] by Dr. Don Batten</ref> See also: [[Philosophical naturalism]]
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==

Revision as of 08:29, March 4, 2017

Evidential apologetics is an approach in Christian apologetics which emphasizes the use of evidence to demonstrate that God exists.

Within the discipline of Christian apologetics are various topics related to evidential apologetics:

Evidential apologetics and non-Christian views

Evidential apologetics also incorporates evidence showing the falsity/improbability of non-Christian worldviews. For example, Dr. Don Batten wrote an article on the origin of life which demonstrates the vexing problem first life is for those who insist that life arose through purely natural processes[1] See also: Philosophical naturalism

See also

External links

  1. ↑ Origin of life by Dr. Don Batten