Difference between revisions of "Textbook bias"
From Conservapedia
DavidB4-bot (Talk | contribs) (clean up & uniformity) |
m (style, -red links) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<ref>[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2000/sep/06/20000906-012022-6094r/ Commentary Piece from the Washington Times.]</ref><ref>[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/may/22/rock-the-ignorance-1836/ Rock the ignorance, ''Washington Times'' Thursday, May 22, 2008 ]</ref> | <ref>[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2000/sep/06/20000906-012022-6094r/ Commentary Piece from the Washington Times.]</ref><ref>[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/may/22/rock-the-ignorance-1836/ Rock the ignorance, ''Washington Times'' Thursday, May 22, 2008 ]</ref> | ||
| − | + | ==See also== | |
| − | + | ||
*[[Media bias]] | *[[Media bias]] | ||
*[[Liberal bias]] | *[[Liberal bias]] | ||
| − | |||
*[[Scientific bias]] | *[[Scientific bias]] | ||
Revision as of 05:09, March 11, 2017
Many American textbooks are rabidly liberal and routinely distort history in order to advance a left leaning agenda. Richard Rahn wrote:
| “ | Many student textbooks, particularly in Europe, and only to a lesser degree in the U.S., have a strong anti-capitalist, pro-government or socialist bias. | ” |
Examples of bias. McDougal Littles "Modern World History Patterns of interaction" claims that "[Guns] are a national plague".
