Difference between revisions of "Atheism and incoherency"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 21: Line 21:
 
== Atheism and origins ==
 
== Atheism and origins ==
  
−
*[[Atheism as a secular origins myth]]
+
*[[Evolution as a secular origins myth]]  
  
 
*[[Atheism and the origin of the universe]]
 
*[[Atheism and the origin of the universe]]
Line 32: Line 32:
  
 
*[[Intelligent design]]
 
*[[Intelligent design]]
 +
 +
*[[Evolution, Liberalism, Atheism, and Irrationality]]
  
 
== Atheism and meaning ==
 
== Atheism and meaning ==

Revision as of 01:05, July 15, 2019

Twp of the definitions that the Merriam-Webster online dictionary gives for the word incoherent is "lacking orderly continuity, arrangement, or relevance" and "lacking normal clarity or intelligibility in speech or thought".[1] The Collins English dictionary indicates concerning the word incoherent: "If someone is incoherent, they are talking in a confused and unclear way... If you say that something such as a policy is incoherent, you are criticizing it because the different parts of it do not fit together properly."[2]

Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM) indicates: "Ravi Zacharias defines the four main questions of life: origin, meaning, morality and destiny and the answers to these questions can determine if a worldview is coherent.[3]

Atheism is a worldview (see: Atheist worldview).

General resources on atheism and incoherency

Below are some general resources on atheism and incoherency:

Atheism and origins

Atheism and meaning

Atheism and morality

Atheism and destiny

See also

  1. ↑ Incoherent
  2. ↑ Incoherent, Collins English dictionary]
  3. ↑ A Coherent Worldview by Ravi Zacharias International Ministries website