Difference between revisions of "Atheism and incoherency"
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
*[[Rebuttals to atheist arguments]] | *[[Rebuttals to atheist arguments]] | ||
| − | + | ==References== | |
| + | {{reflist|2}} | ||
[[Category: Atheism]] | [[Category: Atheism]] | ||
Revision as of 01:06, July 15, 2019
Twp of the definitions that the Merriam-Webster online dictionary gives for the word incoherent is "lacking orderly continuity, arrangement, or relevance" and "lacking normal clarity or intelligibility in speech or thought".[1] The Collins English dictionary indicates concerning the word incoherent: "If someone is incoherent, they are talking in a confused and unclear way... If you say that something such as a policy is incoherent, you are criticizing it because the different parts of it do not fit together properly."[2]
Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM) indicates: "Ravi Zacharias defines the four main questions of life: origin, meaning, morality and destiny and the answers to these questions can determine if a worldview is coherent.[3]
Atheism is a worldview (see: Atheist worldview).
General resources on atheism and incoherency
Below are some general resources on atheism and incoherency:
- Why atheism is incoherent by Dr. Scott M. Sullivan
Atheism and origins
Atheism and meaning
Atheism and morality
Atheism and destiny
See also
References
- ↑ Incoherent
- ↑ Incoherent, Collins English dictionary]
- ↑ A Coherent Worldview by Ravi Zacharias International Ministries website