Difference between revisions of "Talk:Biden's age"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Google
(→Google) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) (→Google) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Right now, I got Biden's age at #32 on Google, ahead of CBS, LA Times, Political Wire, Reuters, NBC, and Biden's own Twitter account. It's up from a few days ago at #35. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 13:20, 9 September 2019 (EDT) | Right now, I got Biden's age at #32 on Google, ahead of CBS, LA Times, Political Wire, Reuters, NBC, and Biden's own Twitter account. It's up from a few days ago at #35. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 13:20, 9 September 2019 (EDT) | ||
:it's up to #23. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 14:51, 13 September 2019 (EDT) | :it's up to #23. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 14:51, 13 September 2019 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::4 keys to getting the article ranked high at Google. 1) Have all the material focus on Biden's age. Google and the public both look for relevancy 2) Pick articles that high at Google that are relevant to Biden's age unless it's a relevant and noteworthy exception such as his hair, medical info related to a matter, etc. 3) Use as authoritative sources as possible. 4) Avoid including unflattering pictures of a person. People like pleasing pictures and if you break this rule, readers will see the use of an unflattering picture as a sign of bias. Obviously, if there is a picture that doesn't break copyright rules that can be used to illustrate a relevant point then that this an exception (bloody eye, etc.).This is the reason I uploaded a new picture of Julian Castro.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:14, 13 September 2019 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:14, September 13, 2019
A link from either MPR or MPL should help, too. RobSDe Plorabus Unum 20:09, 24 August 2019 (EDT)
Biden had a hair transplant, where hairs were removed from his buttocks and placed on his head.[1]
- This could be interesting in mainspace.
- Feel free to add to the article. Also, this article needs to be created: Joe Biden's age vs. Donald Trump's age.
- It would be great if Conservapedia ranked #1 for this search at the major search engines and was the go to source of information on this topic. Due to American's diet, exercise habits and a medical system that can help people live longer, Alzheimer's disease is the #2 killer of Americans. The Japanese are far less likely to suffer cognitive decline because they eat more fish and eat less meat/dairy.Conservative (talk) 09:24, 25 August 2019 (EDT)
- How about a subsection on age-related gaffes? This is from just yesterday. RobSDe Plorabus Unum 11:49, 25 August 2019 (EDT)
- It would be great if Conservapedia ranked #1 for this search at the major search engines and was the go to source of information on this topic. Due to American's diet, exercise habits and a medical system that can help people live longer, Alzheimer's disease is the #2 killer of Americans. The Japanese are far less likely to suffer cognitive decline because they eat more fish and eat less meat/dairy.Conservative (talk) 09:24, 25 August 2019 (EDT)
- ↑ Does Joe Biden Have Butt Hair on His Head?, By Jessica Pressler, The Intelligencer, Aug. 25, 2008.
Right now, I got Biden's age at #32 on Google, ahead of CBS, LA Times, Political Wire, Reuters, NBC, and Biden's own Twitter account. It's up from a few days ago at #35. RobSDe Plorabus Unum 13:20, 9 September 2019 (EDT)
- it's up to #23. RobSDe Plorabus Unum 14:51, 13 September 2019 (EDT)
- 4 keys to getting the article ranked high at Google. 1) Have all the material focus on Biden's age. Google and the public both look for relevancy 2) Pick articles that high at Google that are relevant to Biden's age unless it's a relevant and noteworthy exception such as his hair, medical info related to a matter, etc. 3) Use as authoritative sources as possible. 4) Avoid including unflattering pictures of a person. People like pleasing pictures and if you break this rule, readers will see the use of an unflattering picture as a sign of bias. Obviously, if there is a picture that doesn't break copyright rules that can be used to illustrate a relevant point then that this an exception (bloody eye, etc.).This is the reason I uploaded a new picture of Julian Castro.Conservative (talk) 16:14, 13 September 2019 (EDT)