Difference between revisions of "Talk:COVID-19"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(You make a good point about the proper name of the virus. However, it can be counterproductive to overdo issues re: nomenclature.) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:You make a good point about the proper name of the virus. However, it can be counterproductive to overdo issues re: nomenclature.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:39, 30 March 2020 (EDT) | :You make a good point about the proper name of the virus. However, it can be counterproductive to overdo issues re: nomenclature.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:39, 30 March 2020 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Chloroquine== | ||
| + | Watching a live broadcast right now that covers latest developments on chloroquine. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6Gy9nPAQE0] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 18:46, 30 March 2020 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:46, March 30, 2020
I think this article should be titled Wuhan coronavirus instead, as the current title is the result of the fact that the WHO is owned by Red China, also see previous articles Wuhan coronavirus - Chinese Communist Party response and Global Wuhan coronavirus pandemic. Real45fan (talk) 17:36, 30 March 2020 (EDT)
- You make a good point about the proper name of the virus. However, it can be counterproductive to overdo issues re: nomenclature.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 17:39, 30 March 2020 (EDT)
Chloroquine
Watching a live broadcast right now that covers latest developments on chloroquine. [1] RobSDe Plorabus Unum 18:46, 30 March 2020 (EDT)