Difference between revisions of "Talk:Freethought"
| (9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Of course, there is no atheists who are freethinkers. Jesus said, "He who sins is the slave of sin" and surely [http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism#Commonly_Cited_Arguments_Against_Atheism_and_For_Theism the existing evidence points to the existence of God]. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 23:54, 12 October 2008 (EDT) | Of course, there is no atheists who are freethinkers. Jesus said, "He who sins is the slave of sin" and surely [http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism#Commonly_Cited_Arguments_Against_Atheism_and_For_Theism the existing evidence points to the existence of God]. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 23:54, 12 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
:Why does this redirect to atheism? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 00:00, 13 October 2008 (EDT) | :Why does this redirect to atheism? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 00:00, 13 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::I have my reasons. I suggest you go to http://www.reddit.com/ now and customize your viewing for [[atheism]]. :) :) [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 00:03, 13 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::Can you share these reasons with the community? I don't really care much about who's linking to our website; nor do I care about user-rated news, since the internet community as a whole doesn't care about the same things I do :) [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 00:12, 13 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::::Nothing? I see that [[freethinker]] also redirects to athiesm, but there the talk page is locked. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:07, 13 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | Clearly freethought is a risk to Christianity. It must be stopped. The best way to do that is to scare people by redirecting it to the scary article about [[atheism]]. And it's a lot easier than actually writing an article about [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freethought freethought]. Those atheists at Wikipedia describe it as "a philosophical viewpoint that holds that beliefs should be formed on the basis of science and logic". Sounds a lot harder, and scarier, than just believing what our mommies and daddie tell us if you ask me. [[User:Freethought|Freethought]] 21:58, 15 December 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Page needs some revision== | ||
| + | "Freethinkers" is the term Black conservatives who bolt the [[Democrat plantation]] use to describe themselves. The definition in this article should be more neutral, and criticism of "freethinker" thought should be confined within eras and cultural context. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 16:25, 4 May 2021 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | For example, Sen. [[Tim Scott]] is a Freethinker, not an [[Uncle Tom]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 16:27, 4 May 2021 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:27, May 4, 2021
Of course, there is no atheists who are freethinkers. Jesus said, "He who sins is the slave of sin" and surely the existing evidence points to the existence of God. conservative 23:54, 12 October 2008 (EDT)
- Why does this redirect to atheism? HelpJazz 00:00, 13 October 2008 (EDT)
- I have my reasons. I suggest you go to http://www.reddit.com/ now and customize your viewing for atheism. :) :) conservative 00:03, 13 October 2008 (EDT)
- Can you share these reasons with the community? I don't really care much about who's linking to our website; nor do I care about user-rated news, since the internet community as a whole doesn't care about the same things I do :) HelpJazz 00:12, 13 October 2008 (EDT)
- Nothing? I see that freethinker also redirects to athiesm, but there the talk page is locked. HelpJazz 20:07, 13 October 2008 (EDT)
- Can you share these reasons with the community? I don't really care much about who's linking to our website; nor do I care about user-rated news, since the internet community as a whole doesn't care about the same things I do :) HelpJazz 00:12, 13 October 2008 (EDT)
- I have my reasons. I suggest you go to http://www.reddit.com/ now and customize your viewing for atheism. :) :) conservative 00:03, 13 October 2008 (EDT)
Clearly freethought is a risk to Christianity. It must be stopped. The best way to do that is to scare people by redirecting it to the scary article about atheism. And it's a lot easier than actually writing an article about freethought. Those atheists at Wikipedia describe it as "a philosophical viewpoint that holds that beliefs should be formed on the basis of science and logic". Sounds a lot harder, and scarier, than just believing what our mommies and daddie tell us if you ask me. Freethought 21:58, 15 December 2008 (EST)
Page needs some revision
"Freethinkers" is the term Black conservatives who bolt the Democrat plantation use to describe themselves. The definition in this article should be more neutral, and criticism of "freethinker" thought should be confined within eras and cultural context. RobSFree Kyle! 16:25, 4 May 2021 (EDT)
For example, Sen. Tim Scott is a Freethinker, not an Uncle Tom. RobSFree Kyle! 16:27, 4 May 2021 (EDT)