Difference between revisions of "Risky RINO Removal"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Risky RINO Removal''' is a term that applies to the notion of [[primary]]ing [[Moderate Republicans]] or RINOs in swing or [[Democratic Party|Democrat]]-leaning districts. In [[Delaware]], the RINO governor, [[Mike Castle]], was primaried by [[Christine O'Donnell]], the favorite of the [[Tea Party]] in the race for [[United States Senator]]. However, Tea Party candidates were less electable in [[Joe Biden|Biden]]'s Delaware, and O'Donnell lost the [[general election]] to a Democrat.<ref>http://publicmind.fdu.edu/winsome/final.pdf</ref>
+
'''Risky RINO Removal''' is a term that applies to the notion of [[primary]]ing [[Moderate Republicans]] or RINOs in swing or [[Democratic Party|Democrat]]-leaning districts. In [[Delaware]] in 2010, the RINO governor, [[Mike Castle]], was primaried by [[Christine O'Donnell]], the favorite of the [[Tea Party]], in the race for the [[United States Senate]] seat vacated in 2009 by [[Joe Biden]], who became [[Vice President of the United States|Vice President]] under [[Barack H. Obama]]. However, Tea Party candidates were less electable in Delaware, and O'Donnell lost the [[general election]] to a Democrat, [[Chris Coons]] a Biden ally who still holds the seat.<ref>http://publicmind.fdu.edu/winsome/final.pdf</ref>
  
A current example would be primaring anti=[[Donald Trump|Trump]] [[David Valadao]] who is in a D+5 District where Biden won by more than over ten points. Putting an [[America First]] candidate would be a risky move which could cost the Republicans Valadao's seat.
+
Were Republicans to primary the anti-[[Donald Trump|Trump]] [[U.S. Representative]] [[David Valadao]] of [[California]], whose district is Democrat and voted by more than ten points for Biden, the seat could be lost to a Democrat, one of whom held it from 2019 to 2021.  
  
==Moderates/RINOs too Risky to Primary==
+
The value of [[RINO]]s, particularly in the [[House]], is debatable.  When ten RINOs voted for the second [[impeachment and removal|impeachment]] of [[Donald Trump]], the [[liberal media]] falsely portrayed it as bipartisan.
 +
==Moderates/RINOs too risky to primary==
 
*[[Susan Collins]]
 
*[[Susan Collins]]
 
*[[Carlos Gimenez]]
 
*[[Carlos Gimenez]]
 
*[[Maria Elvira Salazar]]
 
*[[Maria Elvira Salazar]]
*[[John Katko]] - Only Vote out if you can get RINO of exact same mold who would not backstab
+
*[[John Katko]]
*[[David Valadao]] - Only Vote out if you can get RINO of exact same mold who would not backstab
+
*[[David Valadao]]
 
*[[Michelle Steel]]
 
*[[Michelle Steel]]
 
*[[Young Kim]]
 
*[[Young Kim]]

Latest revision as of 17:12, August 6, 2021

Risky RINO Removal is a term that applies to the notion of primarying Moderate Republicans or RINOs in swing or Democrat-leaning districts. In Delaware in 2010, the RINO governor, Mike Castle, was primaried by Christine O'Donnell, the favorite of the Tea Party, in the race for the United States Senate seat vacated in 2009 by Joe Biden, who became Vice President under Barack H. Obama. However, Tea Party candidates were less electable in Delaware, and O'Donnell lost the general election to a Democrat, Chris Coons a Biden ally who still holds the seat.[1]

Were Republicans to primary the anti-Trump U.S. Representative David Valadao of California, whose district is Democrat and voted by more than ten points for Biden, the seat could be lost to a Democrat, one of whom held it from 2019 to 2021.

The value of RINOs, particularly in the House, is debatable. When ten RINOs voted for the second impeachment of Donald Trump, the liberal media falsely portrayed it as bipartisan.

Moderates/RINOs too risky to primary

References