Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:The Problems with Conservapedia"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Protected "Talk:Essay:The Problems with Conservapedia" ([Edit=Administrators only] (indefinite) [Move=Administrators only] (indefinite)))
(No difference)

Revision as of 23:52, October 16, 2021

This essay does bring up some good points. I've recently been particularly irritated with a certain zealous administrator for inserting bigotry on the Main Page comparing atheists and feminists to "mutants." —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Saturday, 15:28, October 16, 2021 (EDT)

Show me that I am wrong about atheists having an above average level of mutations. See: Atheists and genetic mutations
My article ranks #4 for the search "Atheists and genetic mutations" at a popular search engine that begins with a G. Miss G loves my article! It outranks Newsweek's article "Religious People Live Healthier, Longer Lives—While Atheists Collect Mutant Genes" for this search.
By the way, I am less zealous about confronting the atheist movement in the Western world - now that is dead! See: Decline of the atheist movement
At the same time, Sun Tzu did write: ""...when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near." Am I still engaged in anti-atheism efforts online? That is a mystery wrapped in an enigma! Conservative (talk) 19:37, October 16, 2021 (EDT)
Calling groups of people "mutants" is inappropriate, period. You should know better. —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Saturday, 19:39, October 16, 2021 (EDT)
Atheists love genetic mutations! They believe the whole human race would not exist if it were not for mutations. Conservative (talk) 19:48, October 16, 2021 (EDT)
So all you have now are meaningless deflections. Typical... —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Saturday, 19:50, October 16, 2021 (EDT)